Unlock the Editor’s Digest at no cost
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
Sam Bankman-Fried stated he was “very shocked” in October 2022 to study concerning the $8bn of buyer deposits his non-public buying and selling agency Alameda Analysis owed to his FTX crypto trade, giving new particulars in testimony on Friday of the businesses’ dramatic collapse.
In a day of gruelling testimony, Bankman-Fried supplied his account of FTX’s implosion, acknowledging he had made “errors” however implying that his closest staff and pals had stored him at nighttime concerning the scale of the outlet till weeks earlier than his crypto empire got here crashing down.
The previous crypto entrepreneur informed jurors in New York that he solely understood “items” of the total monetary state of his corporations, as he took the stand in federal court docket to defend himself in opposition to accusations that Alameda drained buyer cash from FTX, resulting in the trade’s chapter final November.
Bankman-Fried, the one-time paper billionaire who faces a long time behind bars if convicted on the fraud expenses in opposition to him, shall be cross-examined by prosecutors subsequent week. He has pleaded not responsible.
Carrying a gray swimsuit and purple tie, he calmly talked the jury via the founding of his two corporations — FTX and an affiliated buying and selling agency, Alameda Analysis — with school pals from MIT and former colleagues at New York buying and selling agency Jane Road Capital. The jury has heard testimony from a few of them, together with Gary Wang, Nishad Singh and Caroline Ellison, who’re co-operating with the prosecution.
The witnesses had testified to a number of conversations with the previous chief govt within the months earlier than the businesses collapsed wherein they mentioned the $8bn legal responsibility created as a result of Alameda had obtained FTX buyer deposits into its financial institution accounts earlier than the trade arrange its personal accounts.
He contradicted these accounts, saying he solely discovered the dimensions of the hole when he seemed it up in a brand new model of the corporate database — which he was given entry to in October 2022. Till then, he thought Alameda’s whole money owed to FTX had been round $2bn, he stated.
Even after the invention, he stated he nonetheless thought Alameda would “be good for it” for the reason that buying and selling agency “had loads of asset worth to have the ability to cowl the legal responsibility”.
Earlier within the day Bankman-Fried stated he believed Alameda may do “something” with cash it borrowed from FTX supplied “dangers had been being managed”, whether or not it was to “purchase muffins” or “pay enterprise bills”.
His declare that he didn’t have a full image of his personal corporations’ funds till weeks earlier than their demise has been essential to his defence. Friday’s testimony added new specifics to his account.
His lieutenants had testified that he directed them to extend the raid on buyer cash in June 2022 with a purpose to repay Alameda’s third-party lenders within the midst of the broader crypto crash. He stated it was Ellison who prompt it “most likely made sense” to repay the loans, and that he had assented with out understanding concerning the $8bn legal responsibility.
Defence lawyer Mark Cohen additionally tried to indicate the onslaught of selections and knowledge his shopper had confronted as chief govt of the fast-growing trade. Bankman-Fried stated that he labored 12 hours on a “gentle day” and 22 hours on a “heavy day”, and obtained lots of of Sign chats. He stated he aimed to have solely 60,000 unread emails, however “I didn’t normally succeed”.
Bankman-Fried testified that secret particular privileges that Alameda loved on FTX had been created by Wang and Singh to assist the buying and selling agency present liquidity on the trade — and that he didn’t know the small print on the time.
He additionally solid blame for Alameda’s collapse on Ellison. He testified that he had urged her to hedge the buying and selling agency’s debt-fuelled bets on rising crypto costs. He stated she informed him she was “trying into doing so” however by no means did — finally costing the agency about $10bn.
He stated it had been Ellison’s thought to ship Alameda’s lenders a steadiness sheet that hid its large money owed to FTX, one among seven various variations prosecutors had proven to the jury. He stated he had solely “briefly” mentioned the doc along with her.
The testimony briefly touched upon Bankman-Fried’s “on-again, off-again” relationship with Ellison, which he stated ended for good in 2022 as a result of “she needed extra from [the relationship] than I used to be capable of give”.
He added that he didn’t “have the time or the power” to dwell as much as Ellison’s expectations, and that relationships had been “not one thing I’ve been nice at”.
He had given a preview of his testimony, with out the jury current, on Thursday, answering questions on a variety of points so the choose may resolve whether or not the subjects had been admissible as proof as a part of the defence’s case.
On Friday morning, Decide Lewis Kaplan, who’s overseeing the case, dominated that Bankman-Fried couldn’t reply questions designed to elicit testimony wherein he claims he was following the recommendation of legal professionals when implementing sure insurance policies at FTX and Alameda.